I recently saw a message that if you have as few as THREE images on a web
page, the page will be faster if the images are served through Apache and
not Tomcat. Remember, images, linked css files and included (src=href)
javascript files are static elements also -- not just HTML.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 3:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tomcat/Apache advantage without static pages?
Hi everyone,
i have a question concerning the use of Tomcat in Combination with Apache.
I am currently developing a WebApplication that consists almost entirely of
dynamic (JSP-)pages. The amount of static HTML-pages is negligible.
Are there any advantages concerning the Server performance and/or stability
if I use Tomcat in combination with Apache or will it be fine if I use
Tomcat as a standalone Server?
Thanks,
Helge
------------------------------
Helge Carstensen
ppi Media GmbH
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
