Bryan Rood at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Pier,
>
> I am interested in using a 4.0.something tomcat build.
Good...
> Are there official sources at apache that can confirm the "VERY_stable"
> declaration that you have made?
Never seen a complaint about 4.0b6 running in stand-alone mode.
> My company won't let me use anything but a stable production release.
> Is the 4.0 the same as prod quality?
I would assert that 4.0b6 is at least as stable as 3.2.3 when running with
the HTTP connector in stand alone mode. I'm working on the webapp connector
for Apache for it, and that cannot be considered qualitable as the built in
HTTP.
But let's ask to the master of TC4.0... Craig?
Pier
- Re: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 BERNARDO ANTONIO BUFFA
- RE: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Lo�c Lef�vre
- Re: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Andrew Cooke
- Re: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.... Pier P. Fumagalli
- RE: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Andrew Inggs
- RE: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Andrew Cooke
- RE: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Ignacio J. Ortega
- RE: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Andrew Inggs
- RE: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Andrew Cooke
- RE: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Bryan Rood
- Re: Tomcat 4 / Apache connecter (Was: Tom... Pier P. Fumagalli
- Re: Tomcat 4 / Apache connecter (Was:... chris brown
- RE: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Craig R. McClanahan
- AW: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Nikolic Branislav
- Beyond Tomcat 4..? chris brown
- Re: Beyond Tomcat 4..? Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: Beyond Tomcat 4..? chris brown
- RE: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Jess Holle and Wendy Vidlak
