On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Jonathan Eric Miller wrote:

> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 15:35:09 -0500
> From: Jonathan Eric Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: JNDIRealm questions
>
> Thanks, can you confirm that binding as the user rather as system is
> supported?
>

At present it does not :-(.

There are some proposed patches that provide this facility on the
developer mailing list, and I plan to integrate those "soon".

> Jon
>

Craig


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 3:21 PM
> Subject: Re: JNDIRealm questions
>
>
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Jonathan Eric Miller wrote:
> >
> > > Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 15:08:12 -0500
> > > From: Jonathan Eric Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: JNDIRealm questions
> > >
> > > I did a search of the Tomcat Developer List archive and found that it
> looks
> > > like #2 is possible (or was only planned and isn't yet implemented?),
> so,
> > > that's cool. Now, if I could only find the documentation on how to use
> > > this... ;-) Craig, if you're listening, can you post an example Realm
> entry
> > > for JNDIRealm that would go in server.xml? If there were a
> JNDIRealm.howto,
> > > like the JDBCRealm.howto, that would be great. I'm guessing that you
> guys
> > > just haven't had a chance to do that yet. I'd being willing to write one
> up
> > > similar to the JDBC one once I get it figured out. A sample entry for a
> user
> > > and a role in LDIF format would also be very helpful. Also, I like the
> > > example JDBCRealm entries that are currently in server.xml, if there was
> a
> > > sample one for JNDIRealm that would be great.
> > >
> > > Jon
> > >
> >
> > I'm about halfway through a new HOWTO page that covers all three realm
> > implementations -- it should be done by next week.  It will need to
> > include more than one example, because there's more than one "usual" way
> > that people populate their LDAP servers.
> >
> > Craig
>
>
>

Reply via email to