I found some documentation on 4.0.1 which says that the AJP connector in 4.0.1 does not support load balancing. Does this mean that I cannot use sticky sessions using Tomcat 4.0.1 (because mod_jk relies on AJP connector). Is that true? OR does it mean that it will provide sticky sessions, but load balancing is random.
What is the latest version of Tomcat that will support load balancing with sticky sessions (using URL rewriting) with some kind of random load balancing Subbu Kaleyathodi -----Original Message----- From: Andrew McGhee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 6:20 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Sticky session with Tomcat 4.0 and mod_jk Good posting - We are assuming that mod_jk is in essence similar / superset of mod_jserv, of which the following information appears to be excelent regarding failover. http://java.apache.org/jserv/howto.load-balancing.html Is this still valid for mod_jk as well? (accounting for changes in configuration to do loadbalancing for mod_jk) -----Original Message----- From: Subbu Kaleyathodi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 December 2001 06:56 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Sticky session with Tomcat 4.0 and mod_jk Hi All, We are using Tomcat 4.0.1 with Tomcat and would like to use mod_jk as the connector from Apache to Tomcat. The main reason for going with mod_jk is because I read some snippets of documentation that mentioned that it supported sticky sessions. But I haven't found anything comprehensive on this topic. I wanted to find out of people have used mod_jk with Tomcat 4.0.1 for sticky sessions (one of our requirements is that we not use cookies - we will be using URL rewriting). Also I am not clear what is th advantage of using mod_webapp over mod_jk (BTW, does mod_webapp support sticky sessions). Any help is appreciated Subbu Kaleyathodi -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
