Hi Larry

in my application i want two servers(tomcat 3.2.3) residing on two different
machines to cater to requests coming another different machinewhich keeps
forwarding the requests to either of the servers.Pls guide how can i achieve
the same.I have added two workers in in my workers.properties on the
dispatcher machine , but it keeps sending the request to only the first
machine.

--Hemant
----- Original Message -----
From: "Larry Isaacs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:58 PM
Subject: RE: Configureing multiple JVMs on Tomcat 3.3


> You would still use two separate server.xml files, such
> as server1.xml and server2.xml.  If you wanted them
> both to serve the same contexts, you could leave the:
>
>     <ContextXmlReader config="conf/apps.xml" />
>
> unchanged.  If you wanted to serve different contexts,
> change server1.xml to be:
>
>     <ContextXmlReader config="conf/apps1.xml" />
>
> and server2.xml to be:
>
>     <ContextXmlReader config="conf/apps2.xml" />.
>
> The first version reads apps1.xml and all files matching
> the pattern apps1-*.xml.  The second version reads
> apps2.xml and all files matching the pattern apps2-*.xml.
>
> Cheers,
> Larry
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: James Chuang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 8:32 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: Configureing multiple JVMs on Tomcat 3.3
> >
> >
> > Under Tomcat 3.2.3, I had 2 serverXXX.xml  files, and I
> > started 2 instances
> > of Tomcat, each with it's own serverXXX.XML file.  This
> > allowed each app to
> > have it's own JVM.
> >
> > Looking at 3.3's documentation, it seems the right way to
> > define contexts is
> > to use app_XXX.XML file in the conf directory, and let tomcat
> > find them
> > directly.
> >
> > Question, does each context have it's own JVM?  If not, then
> > how should I
> > create multiple JVMs?  It looks like I have to go back to putting the
> > context definition in 2 separate server.XML files, then call them
> > separately, and not use the APP-XXX.XML route, which seems to be the
> > preferred route.
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > jchuang
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>


--
To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to