Unfortunately, Tomcat 4.x doesn't support load-balancing, yet -- even with mod_jk. So, if you need it, you should stick with 3.3.
Thanks, --jeff ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hunter Hillegas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat User List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:31 AM Subject: Re: Stability of Tomcat 3.3 vs. 4.0 > I would suggest Tomcat 4.0 because it is integrated into Jboss which gives > you a MAJOR speed up between the servlet layer and the Jboss layer. Major > speed up. > > > From: "Wilson, Wayne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 13:21:34 -0500 > > To: "Tomcat Users List (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Stability of Tomcat 3.3 vs. 4.0 > > > > Hi, > > > > Because of some deadlock bugs in Tomcat 3.2.3 that we are experiencing (891, > > 1006 & 1798), we are going to have to switch to either Tomcat 3.3 or 4.X. > > What do people think about the stability of each of these versions? We will > > be running this on W2K in conjunction with JBoss and because we need load > > balancing we will be using mod_jk. > > > > What do you think? > > > > --Wayne > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -- > To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
