Oops! I missed the statement about multiple IP address, sorry. However, instructions for setting this up may be found here: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-3.3-doc/in-process-howto.html
----- Original Message ----- From: "chris brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 9:10 AM Subject: Re: Problems using same port for several services (even with different IP / hostname) | Yes they *do* have the same port, but use different IP addresses. | | In IIS, go to the Management Console for the web server, and open the | properties window for any web site. If you look at the "Web Site" tab, | you'll see an "IP address" listbox, which is by default set to "(All | Unassigned)". If you look at the listbox's options, you'll see a list of all | IP addresses bound to the machine (normally, there's only one, but you can | add more if your network is set up appropriately - check out TCP/IP | properties for the machine). Inktomi Search is a stand-alone server, with | its own in-built web server (it's NOT an ISAPI extension); it too can bind | to the same port as long as the IP address is different. I should know -- I | distribute it !!! ;-) | | I'm not trying to start a flame war or whatever, I just have a problem that | I'm trying to solve, which is why I'd like to explain the problem in more | detail, because I still need a solution. | | I'm well aware of the impossibility of using the same port on the same IP | address, and do know the difference between that and domain-name-based | virtual hosting. | | Thank you anyway for taking the time to reply. But unfortunately, the | problem still remains. Any other ideas ? | | Thanks, | -Chris | | ----- Original Message ----- | From: "Tom Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 4:40 PM | Subject: Re: Problems using same port for several services (even with | different IP / hostname) | | | > Contrary to your statement below, only one process may bind to the | > same port (80 in this case) at the same time. | > | > Your IIS and Inktomi servers do not both share port 80. | > | > No, they don't. | > | > I've never worked with Inktomi, but it's conceivable that it is | > being front-ended by IIS, (via an ISAPI connector of some sort). | > This would explain why you think that it is available through port 80. | > | > Tomcat may be front-ended via IIS in a similar manner. All client | > requests go to IIS, which funnels them to Tomcat via an ISAPI connector. | > | > Instructions for setting this up may be found here: | > http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-3.3-doc/in-process-howto.html | > | > Tom Drake | > ----- Original Message ----- | > From: "chris brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > To: "tomcat-user" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 6:51 AM | > Subject: Problems using same port for several services (even with | different | > IP / hostname) | > | > | > | Hello, | > | | > | I've got to add a small Tomcat-based webapp onto a machine which already | > is | > | already several webservers. One is an IIS webserver, the other is a | > search | > | engine (Inktomi Enterprise Search) with it's own built-in search engine. | > | All must run on port 80 because that's company firewall policy, and all | > must | > | run on the same host because that's all the company's prepared to | dedicate | > | in terms of resources... | > | | > | So far, no problem with the other services. The machine has been | assigned | > | several unique IP addresses and different names in the DNS. A similar | > setup | > | has been created for the Tomcat service (a unique IP address and DNS | > entry). | > | Tomcat responds on this IP address and domain name correctly when the | port | > | is anything other than "80". I believe that the elements <Engine>, | > <Host>, | > | and <Alias> (the latter is within the <Host> element) are all correctly | > | set... the problem seems to be with the <Connector> element: | > | | > | <Connector className="org.apache.catalina.connector.http.HttpConnector" | > | address="x.x.x.x" port="80" minProcessors="5" maxProcessors="75" | > | enableLookups="true" redirectPort="443" | > | acceptCount="10" debug="0" connectionTimeout="60000"/> | > | | > | My "server.xml" file is pretty standard, except that the Apache Service | > for | > | mod_webapp has been removed and I've changed hostnames and ports as | > | appropriate. I added the "address" argument as described in the Tomcat | > | documentation, but the results I'm getting are as if this attribute was | > | ignored. | > | | > | When checking the logs and STDOUT/STDERR, I see that when the port is | 80, | > | Tomcat fails to start due to an exception being thrown (the basic | message | > is | > | that the port is in use. This is not the case for the specified port: | > it's | > | as if Tomcat tried binding to a different port + ip/hostname. | > | | > | None of the other services intercept each other's requests erroneously - | > | there doesn't seem to any conflicts with them. | > | | > | Am I doing something wrong? What should I do or check, and how can I | make | > | all these services work together correctly? | > | | > | Thanks, | > | Christopher Brown | > | | > | | > | | > | -- | > | To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > | For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > | Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > | | > | | > | | > | > | > -- | > To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > | > | | | | -- | To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | | | -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
