It's all working just fine for me but I'm using third party libraries
too- jdbc driver from oracle,castor, jboss,glue. I place these in common\lib
and all looks good under jdk14 final. I think LightEdition dosen't contains
'standard extension' libraries because 1.4 already
has all of them.Though, I don't know how about performance optimizations for
that version(async I/O etc. features).
In you case- give us some more info about 'some classes' and you actions.

Regards.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug Fields" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 5:45 AM
Subject: Classes not being found in 4.0.2 but are found in 4.0.1 (and what
is LE?)


> Hello all,
>
> I tried to move to Tomcat 4.0.2-LE-jdk1.4 today from Tomcat 4.0.1 (both
> running on the new JDK 1.4).
>
> I have put several jar files in common/lib - including such standards as
> the postgresql.jar and cos.jar.
>
> Under 4.0.1, things work just fine. In 4.0.2 (LE-jdk1.4, which I assume is
> what I should use if I use JDK1.4, but it doesn't say anywhere what the
> differences are) I get a NoClassDefFoundError for some classes in one jar.
> I tried moving it from common/lib into my webapps/APPNAME/WEB-INF/lib
> directory, and an even worse thing happened: no classes whatsoever were
> found in that jar.
>
> When in WEB-INF/lib it is as if it isn't even being class loaded at all,
> while in common/lib, some classes are loaded and others are not - the
point
> where the NoClassDefFoundError is thrown in common/lib is in one of the
> classes in that .jar, while in WEB-INF/lib, it's in my classes, on the
> first call to a class in that .jar.
>
> The .jar has been run through an obfuscator (or so it seems from
> decompiling it in trying to figure out what was going on), but works fine
> on 4.0.1 under both JDK 1.4 and 1.3.1_02 under Linux.
>
> Does anyone have any ideas?
>
> Also - does anyone know what the difference is between:
>
> jakarta-tomcat-4.0.2-LE-jdk14.tar.gz
> jakarta-tomcat-4.0.2.tar.gz
>
> A recursive diff showed many fewer files in the LE edition, presumably
> because they are provided if you use JDK 1.4. (Lots of changes in the doc,
> but that's from the dates in the javadocs being different, and lots of
> changes in other .jars as well.)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Doug
>
> [ If this is a repost, I apologize; I did not receive back a copy of my
> initial posting after many hours and re-sent it. ]
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
>




--
To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to