I don't see anything in your setup that looks wrong. Just for kicks, I
set my test server's log level for mod_jk to "warn" and I didn't see
any messages relating to non-servlet document requests. Something is
fishy on your system. Are non-servlet requests being properly returned to
the browser? Your mod_jk log certainly makes it seem like '/images/logo_level2.gif'
is being mapped into the servlet name space.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Cindy Ballreich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: REPOST: mod_jk.log question


>
> Thanks for your reply!
>
> Here is my mod_jk.conf which is referenced from httpd.conf...
>
> <IfModule !mod_jk.c>
>   LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk.so
> </IfModule>
> JkWorkersFile "/usr/local/java/catalina/conf/jk/workers.properties"
> JkLogFile "/usr/local/java/catalina/logs/mod_jk.log"
> JkLogLevel warn
> Alias /applications/ "/usr/local/java/catalina/webapps/applications"
> JkMount /applications/* ajp13
> JkMount /applications/*.jsp ajp13
>
> I do have an access log set up for Tomcat and it only shows requests for stuff inside
the applications directory. It's ignoring anything requested from anywhere else. 
Likewise,
Apache's access_log shows the request for the jsp page (which makes sense since it was
called on port 80), but nothing else. All this is as I would expect.
>
> However, mod_jk.log is showing an entry for every single request that comes to the
server, including Nimda probes!! I'm willing to ignore it if everything else is ok, but
I'm concerned that I've got some sort of configuration error somewhere that's going to
bite me later on.
>
> Thanks again!
>
> Cindy
>
>
> At 12:25 PM 3/22/02 -0600, Jeff Larsen wrote:
> >It all depends on the relevant Alias and JkMount directives in your Apache
configuration.
> >You'll need to post them in order for us to make any useful analysis. Here's an 
>example
of
> >my config
> >where Apache serves the static content. The servlet context is "/online".
> >
> ># tell Apache where my app files are
> >Alias /online /www/tomcat/webapps/online
> >
> >JkMount /online/*.jsp ajp13 # Tomcat handles all JSP's
> ># mount only URL's SPECIFICALLY mapped to servlet, all
> ># others (like /online/images) are handled by Apache directly
> >JkMount /online/login ajp13
> >JkMount /online/order ajp13
> >
> >Also, look at the Tomcat access log (if you have one configured). Compare it to the
access
> >log
> >for Apache. If you have things set up right, you will see the static content 
>requests
in
> >the
> >Apache log, but not the Tomcat access log.
> >
> >Jeff
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Cindy Ballreich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 11:04 AM
> >Subject: REPOST: mod_jk.log question
> >
> >
> >>
> >> I'm using mod_jk with Tomcat 4.0.1 and Apache 1.3.19 on a Redhat 7.0 system.
> >>
> >> Looking at my mod_jk.log file, it appears that mod_jk is trying to map every 
>request
> >that comes to my server, regardless of whether it should be handled by Tomcat or
Apache.
> >This seems very inefficient to me and I'm wondering if I have a configuration 
>problem
> >somewhere. Otherwise everything seems to be working correctly and all pages (jsp and
> >otherwise) are being served correctly. Perhaps this is normal and I just need to 
>change
my
> >log level and ignore it. (log level is currently "warn".) I'd appreciate some input.
> >>
> >> mod_jk.log entry of a request that should be (and is) handled by Apache...
> >> [Wed Mar 20 10:07:35 2002]  [jk_uri_worker_map.c (351)]: Into
> >jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker
> >> [Wed Mar 20 10:07:35 2002]  [jk_uri_worker_map.c (368)]: Attempting to map URI
> >'/images/logo_level2.gif'
> >> [Wed Mar 20 10:07:35 2002]  [jk_uri_worker_map.c (456)]:
> >jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, done without a match
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> Cindy
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> >--
> >To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


--
To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to