I'd like to run your test on my platform... and share the info.. i think performance is a "tweak" issue, but often one of the minor details often under addressed... mail me the test if you want..
todd http://www.wiserlabz.com collaborative effort to promote Novell and Open Source solutions Dahnke, Eric wrote: >Performance Testing: > >Test Machine: TC4.0, JDK1.3.1_01, RH7.1, 700MHZ, 256M >Page being served = <h1>Hello World</H1> index.html > >concurrent users : 10 >requests/sec : 39 >test duration : 5 mins >result code 200 (pages served) : 11690 >result code NA (failures) : 0 > >concurrent users : 100 >requests/sec : 168 >test duration : 5 mins >result code 200 (pages served) : 49376 >result code NA (failures) : 1238 > >concurrent users : 400 >requests/sec : 233 >test duration : 5 mins >result code 200 (pages served) : 47321 >result code NA (failures) : 22806 > > >I have tested Apache 1.3.x and IIS serving static pages using these >parameters and both display about 2x the performance. (twice as many pages >served in the same amount of time and half as many errors). IS THERE >ANYTHING I CAN DO TO INCREASE TC PERFORMANCE. (ie. MinSpareServers 5, >MaxSpareServers 10, stuff like that). > >-- >To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
