This is a feature that we really need.  I would consider writing it myself
if I knew more about how mod_jk works, what previous discussion has gone
on in this area, how much work it involves, etc.  Any suggestions?

On Tue, 2 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> There is no such tool for mod_jk yet.
>
> Next version ( Jk2 ) will have such a thing - but it's not even alpha,
> it'll take few more months to complete it.
>
> Costin
>
>
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Matthew Tepel wrote:
>
> > We are working on transitioning from Jserv to Tomcat 4.0 (believe it or
> > not), and there is one problem I haven't found the answer to in the
> > documentation.
> >
> > We use apache with a pool of remote java servers.  There is a tool (and
> > web interface) that allows us to tell mod_jserv not to send new requests
> > to particular java servers.  We use this so that we can "drain" particular
> > java servers and release new code on them in a way that affects only a
> > small number of users.
> >
> > I have not discovered a tool or web interface that would allow marking
> > particular workers as "inactive" so that the load balancer:
> > a) sends requests with a session cookie for an inactive worker to that
> > worker
> > b) sends requests no with session cookie to only active workers
> >
> > I have done some web searches and seen discussions about patches relating
> > to such a feature, but I haven't found documentation about whether this is
> > included in Tomcat 4.0 and how to use it.
> >
> > I would greatly appreciate your help in this.
> >
> > -MT
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>


--
To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to