On 04/23 15:20 Joel Rees wrote: > So, how do you think Turbine compares to Struts? I've been looking at both, > but my colleagues prefer the designated standard track.
I can't tell; never been used Struts (but I've taken a look at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00495.html) Turbine is a template-based web apps framework, and mainly uses servlets. It seems that Struts is too, but it uses JSPs for the presentation (view). So, I think if you like to put Java codes in the scripts, then Struts would be for you. But if your scripts (for presentation) are not so complex and you like to put your business logic on servlets, then I believe that Turbine is for you. In a sense, JSPs are templates too, but they put (you could put) lots of business logic in them. Turbine doesn't want you to do so (presentation is presentation, only some if's are allowed :-); if you need to do templating a lot, you can use the templating support (ie: Velocity), but if not, you can stick to just servlets (and ECS, maybe). BTW, what is the "standard track" in web applications building...? Oki -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
