- Are you using tomcat with Apache ? or just tomcat ? - is the DNS www.xxx.net pointing to the server where you run tomcat (apache ?)
> What's up? Is it because maybe it's impossible to have > two webapps of the same context name on different "virtual hosts" from the > same container? If you try setting up only: www.XXX.net in your server.xml does the link: www.xxx.net/menphis work ? Pablo. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phillip Morelock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, 25. April 2002 16:39 Subject: Re: tomcat 3.x virtual hosts > I apologize BIG TIME big time for the double posting of this, but I haven't > gotten an answer, and it's been a couple of days...I know, I am impatient. > Sorry. > > I only have one request: if this hasn't been answered because everyone > thinks I'm an idiot, please reply to me offline and tell me RTFM. I > seriously cannot find the information that I need to make this work, and I > have RT'ed every FM out there. I have been using TC for a long time, and > this is honestly the first time i've seen this come up. I can totally hack > a workaround for myself, but my current ideas are all pretty ugly and as > this application is already deployed, I am loathe to destabilize it too > much. > > if i do not get replies I will assume that what I am asking for is not > common or not possible within the framework of my current knowledge. > > Thanks, > Phillip > > P.S. My precise tomcat version is 3.2.4, my environment is Redhat 7.2. > > > On 4/22/02 12:19 PM, "Phillip Morelock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > I am using virtual hosting on Tomcat 3.x standalone but I can't seem to make > > my scenario work: > > > > www.xxx.com/memphis > > and > > www.xxx.net/memphis > > > > Basically the only difference between the two (they're literally the same > > webapp) is that in the web.xml file, I provide a different database name for > > my load-on-startup servlet to create a pool of connections to (not IP > > address -- it's the same database server, just a different DB name). My > > server.xml looks like this: > > > > <Host name="www.XXX.com"> > > <Context path="/memphis" > > docBase="webapps/memphis" /> > > <Context path="/" > > docBase="webapps/ROOT" /> > > </Host> > > <Host name="www.XXX.net"> > > <Context path="/memphis" > > docBase="netwebapps/memphis" /> > > <Context path="/" > > docBase="netwebapps/ROOT" /> > > </Host> > > > > So basically, I have two different folders -- the default "webapps" folder > > and then one I created called "netwebapps." This works, tomcat doesn't > > complain -- in fact, it even connects to the database twice during startup > > (I have debug messages), so I *know* it runs my load-on-startup servlet > > twice. So I know it knows I want to run two webapps. > > > > But here's the funny thing, when I go to www.xxx.net/memphis in my browser, > > it returns a 404. .com still works like it always did, even before i set up > > virtual hosting. What's up? Is it because maybe it's impossible to have > > two webapps of the same context name on different "virtual hosts" from the > > same container? > > > > Cheers and TIA > > fillup > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
