Why don't you set the user roles table to be the same as the users table. Have a user_role field in the users table with a default value "default role" or something. That way when you create a new user a role is automatically created for them with the role of "default role". Then you don't have to change anything or rewrite the hasRole() method.
-----Original Message----- From: Geoff Peters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 1:36 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Bypassing user role assignment??? So it isn't possible to set a default role for everyone at login with a parameter in the web.xml file? -----Original Message----- From: Ralph Einfeldt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: June 4, 2002 8:34 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: AW: Bypassing user role assignment??? The only way I see, is to create your own realm by extending JDBC Realm and overriding the hasRole() method. > -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Geoff Peters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Juni 2002 13:19 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Bypassing user role assignment??? > > > Does anyone know if it is possible to bypass the requirement > to have user roles defined within a table in the JDBC Realm? > Reason being is that I have an app where all users need to be > "standard", and I have scripts and other apps creating the > users, therefore bypassing the user role definition would > save me from having to edit these other scripts and processes > (which are not Java based......) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
