On Wednesday 26 June 2002 16:42, you wrote:
> I remember one of our sys admins having issues (the SocketException
> looks familiar) and just upgrading to 4.x through a tarball. It's not
> pretty (and we miss being able to upgrade through apt-get), but
> tomcat's working just fine now.
Mmmmm, I see. I would of course like to use the .debs ("stick to your
distro, son" is a common advice for people in my position) :-)
Any other options....? :-)
>Any reason why you're using apache
> from unstable instead of testing?
Hehe, I asked the same question to debian-apache yesterday... :-)
Long story, really (I guess OT), but since you asked:
Basically, there is some confusion as to the upgrade cycle right now,
I'm certainly confused. They created unofficial 1.3.26 debs for Woody
in a hurry, but that's not the way it is usually done, since security
upgrades is usually just for stable. I have unstable in my sources.list
(I wanted gnupg-1.0.7 some time ago, it had a new feature I really
needed), but set default distro to testing. For some reason not quite
clear to me, apt told me that I should upgrade to the one in
unstable... So I did. From the response I got in debian-apache, I think
they probably differ only in version number.
Best,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
Astrophysicist/IT Consultant/Skeptic/Ski-orienteer/Orienteer/Mountaineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
