hi, we have a question ? when should we use mod_proxy and when mod_jk ?
we have a webapp with jsp's, which works best with tc 4.0.4 and apache 2.0.36 as tandem, because apache serves the static content much better (many gifs for toolbars, many pdf-files etc) at this time we have configured this using mod_jk2 last day we made some experiences using apache as proxy using mod_proxy we did the same as before: apache serves all static content from the webapp and sends the othe requests to tomcat we configured proxy-params in the tomcat server.xml and did some first tests: seems to be equal to the access-times using mod_jk so now we have the questions: what are the pros and cons of these two methods to let apache serve static and tomcat the rest of the web-application ? our webapp uses jsp's, java-script, only one applet for styled text - entry, no tag-libs, no JDBC (we use the OODB FastObjects) apache sets the http header so the gifs we need to display toolbars in the windows will not always asked for to the server thanks for infos regards ekkehard -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
