My (probably poor) understanding is that Coyote is the "newest and best" Http connector. It's my understanding this would be your best choice for a stand-alone Tomcat installation, if you're running Tomcat 4.1.x. So far as the *_jk connectors go, I further have the impression that mod_jk is the more solid, robust choice - mod_jk2 has come about to address Apache2, and is (I believe) a new code-base. Probably you want to be using mod_jk. I use mod_jk successfully with Apache 1.3.23.
You can find mod_jk.so (or mod_jk.dll) in the Tomcat 3.3 distribution tree. AFAIK these DSOs will fully and correctly support whatever you want to do. That's where I got mine from, and it works fine from what I can tell. You could always build them from source. If you choose to do that, search the distribution heirarchy thoroughly. They are a bit "scattered", to put it quite plainly. You will find them though ;-) Regards, Eddie Sankaranarayanan (Ganesh) Ganapathy wrote: >Hi All, > >How does JK2 differ JK. If I want to set up tomcat4.0.3 against apache1.3.26 which >one should I be using? > >How are coyote connectors different from the JK connectors ? Can somebody explain? > >Also I see that none of the release version of JK connectors are available at >http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/. Is there someplace else >I should look for ? or is the only option is to build them from source? > >For tomcat4.0.3 atleast the win32 and solaris8 JK binaries were available. I dont >find them for tomcat4.0.4 , am I missing something here? > >Any help will be greatly appreciated! > >Thanx in advance, >Ganesh > > > > > > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
