On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Sullivan, Mark E wrote:

> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 11:36:38 -0500
> From: "Sullivan, Mark E" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 'Tomcat Users List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: parsing xml config file
>
> thanks craig. It's reassuring when you use smaller projects like digester
> when you know that a larger more popular project like tomcat is also using
> it.

I hope Struts (which also uses Digester) also counts as "popular" in your
book :-).  In fact, Digester was originally (Struts 1.0.x) named
org.apache.struts.util.Digester before it was refactored into
commons-digester.

Craig


>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:37 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: parsing xml config file
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Sullivan, Mark E wrote:
>
> > Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 08:54:13 -0500
> > From: "Sullivan, Mark E" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Tomcat-User@Jakarta. Apache. Org (E-mail)"
> >     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: parsing xml config file
> >
> > Does anyone know if tomcat uses Digester from the jakarta commons project
> to
> > parse it's xml config file? I cannot find any evidence of this after
> > (briefly) searching the source code. If it doesn't, does it using an
> outside
> > package or just custom stuff written within the project?
> >
>
> Tomcat 4.1.x does indeed use Digester.  Previous versions of Tomcat used
> an internal Tomcat utility called XmlMapper (which was one of the bases
> for Digester's design).
>
> > thanks,
> > Mark
> >
>
> Craig
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to