I guess you have to ask the person who configured this.
This doesn't look like a standard configuration of tomcat.

If you want to run tomcat behind apache you should remove 
all HttpConnectors. (Unless the person that has configured 
this doesn't have a special reason.) The AJP connector is 
needed, as it is the the counterpart for the mo_jk module
in the apache.

Ralph Einfeldt
Uptime Internet Solution Center GmbH
Hamburg, Germany
Hosting, Content Management, Java Consulting
http://www.uptime-isc.de 

> -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Heligon Sandra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 2. August 2002 13:51
> An: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Betreff: RE: Apache/Tomcat Connectors List
> 
> 
> Thanks a lot for your explanations there are very easy understood 
> and very good.
> Even so I have questions:
> 
> - What interest is it to have multiple HttpConnectors ?
> In the server.xml file we find 
> - non-SSL HTTP/1.1 Connector on port 8080 
> - an SSL HTTP/1.1 Connector on port 8443 
> why not I understand SSL or not for security.
> 
> - a Proxied HTTP/1.1 Connector on port 8081 (what is it ?)
> - a non-SSL HTTP/1.0 Test Connector on port 8082 (what is it ?)
> - an AJP 1.3 Connector on port 8009 (in order that Tomcat 
> works with Apache but this definition is in the standalone service why
? it 
> is used for the communication between Tomcat and Apache. It would have
to be
> in the Tomcat-Apache service)
> 
> when we develop a commercial site the consumer doesn't have 
> to know the notion of web server. He only has to enter the 
> expected URI without specifying
> a port. So I repeat what is the interest to declare all these 
> connectors ?
> By default only one "process or connector"(it is not really the term)
> receives the HttpRequest. This depends on the port specified in the 
> URI or in the Http.conf if no port is specified in the URI.
> 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to