hi,
I 've copy everything from tomcat 3.2 to tomcat4 because I'm not the
developer who done this apps, so I'll ask the developer to update the
deployment, beside, have you got a WEB-INF/web.xml example , so I can show
it to my developers?
and about the e.i. all are running fine.
Thank
RG

----- Original Message -----
From: "Shapira, Yoav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 11:33 AM
Subject: RE: Loading new context on tomcat 4


Hi,
If you're using tomcat 4.x, why is your DTD written to the version 2.2
spec?
You probably cannot copy the app directory from tomcat 3.2.1 to 4.x
without any changes.  You need to update your deployment descriptor at
least.  Have you also verified a proper installation of 4.x, i.e. all
examples running etc.?

Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Rodrigo Giammarini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 10:04 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Loading new context on tomcat 4
>
>Hi !
>I have a problem loading new context on tomcat 4.0.4 on a Redhat 7.2
and
>java 1.4.0_01, the app that wont work in tomcat 4 is working on tomcat
>3.2.1-
>If I delete this lines from de webapps/context-name/WEB-INF/web.xml the
>page is loaded but not displayed an in the /manger/list appears as
running-
>web.xml
><?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
>
><!DOCTYPE web-app
>    PUBLIC "-//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Web Application 2.2//EN"
>    "http://java.sun.com/j2ee/dtds/web-app_2.2.dtd";>
><web-app>
>
>  <session-config>
>    <session-timeout>10</session-timeout>
>  </session-config>
>
>  <servlet>
>    <servlet-name>Controller</servlet-name>
>    <servlet-class>com.cti.webgeoloc.Controller</servlet-class>
>  </servlet>
>
></web-app>
>
>Thanks in advance!

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to