Robert L Sowders wrote: >FWIW mod_webapp would not be the way to go with FreeBSD. Mod_webapp would >force everything mounted to a tomcat directory to be processed by tomcat >even the static pages. You will have finer grained control if you use >something like mod_jk2 which will let you process things by file >extension, so you can relegate things Java to tomcat and things static to >apache no matter where the document resides. Mod_jk2 will also let you >run TC in-process with Apache2. > >rls > > > > >Vincent Berruchon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >08/27/2002 06:51 AM >Please respond to "Tomcat Users List" > > > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > cc: > Subject: Apache 2? > >Does somebody know if the mod_webapp connector work with Apache 2 and >Tomcat 4.0.3? > > > Thanks > Vincent >PS : Do you know where to find a FreeBSD versoin of mod_webapp? > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > I Strongly agree, I have tried mod_webapp and mod_jk on FreeBSD , and much prefer mod_jk, the file extention spec does make a big difference. I built mod_webapp from the http://www.pubbitch.org/jboss directions , but I thought the was a port now. I know there is a mod_jk port , or at least was , Ernst De Hann did it, it may work with apache2 not sure, I usually build apache myself, so I`m not sure. I`ll be building mod_jk again soon, I`ll pass on revelant info, but do check the ports. Adrian
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
