If you have a snippet of the server.xml file that uses DBCP, please could you post it here. Although I think i got DBCP to work with SQLServer, pooling was not being used. The reason i say this is because, i had set my maxActive to 7 and my pool kept growing.
I would really appreciate it if you could post your server.xml here. Thanks Amitabh -----Original Message----- From: Dennis Muhlestein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 3:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Poolman Configuration We use DBCP with SQL Server and haven't had a single problem. Am I missing something or are you? -Dennis On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 12:11, Amitabh Dubey wrote: > DBCP does not work well with SQL Server, so i was told. I guess i will have > to look into some commercial product then. Any suggestions? > > Thank you > Amitabh > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rick Fincher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 1:06 PM > To: Tomcat Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Poolman Configuration > > > Is anybody still developing Poolman? I heard the original developer retired > it. If you are just starting out you might want to use another connection > pooling package like DBCP in the Jakarta Commons project, so you don't get > locked into a defunct product. > > This is from the web site listed on SourceForge as Poolman's home page > (www.codestudio.com): > > PoolMan is no longer available or supported through this site. It did > exceedingly well during its lifetime, and I appreciate the important role it > played in so many distributed applications over the past three years. If you > are looking for connection and object pooling mechanisms, they can now be > found in application servers such as JRun, Tomcat and the Jakarta Project, > and other J2EE products and servers. > > -PS Neville > > > Rick > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > Does anyone have poolman successfully configured. If so, please could you > > post your poolman.xml. If you have used it with SQL Server, then that > would > > be perfect. > > > > Thanks > > Amitabh > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
