is jk2 still slow with inprocess-JNI, cuz that is why I want to use it. Malachi
10/8/2002 11:50:35 AM, "Michael Riess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Thanks for the advice, but that doesn't work. I guess it's a bug, not a >feature ;-). For now I will use mod_jk until jk2 is stable. jk2 seemed a bit >slow anyway ... but it will definitely be faster than mod_jk as soon as the >unix sockets and 1.4 NIO are working. > >Mike > >-----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- >Von: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. Oktober 2002 20:38 >An: 'Tomcat Users List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Betreff: RE: jk2 uri mapping of SSL vhost > > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Michael Riess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 8:34 PM >> To: Tomcat Users List >> Subject: AW: jk2 uri mapping of SSL vhost >> >> >> Just for clarity: I have an webapp that should work with or >> without SSL, so I need a way to map URIs to that webapp >> without regard of the virtual host it comes from. >> Alternatively, I could use two mappings for the two vhosts >> (the default and the SSL host), but anyway: I would >> appreciate for any suggestion for the right wk2.properties >> definitions. >> > >Then just use the default mapping > >[uri:/xyz/*] > >Without any host definitions. > > >> Here's my guess #1 (doesn't work) >> >> [uri:192.168.42.42:*/xyz/*] >> >> and guess #2 (doesn't work either) >> >> [uri:192.168.42.42:80/xyz/*] >> [uri:192.168.42.42:443/xyz/*] >> >> Tried using * instead of IP (you guessed right ... doesn't work). >> >> >> Mike >> >> -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- >> Von: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. Oktober 2002 20:11 >> An: 'Tomcat Users List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Betreff: RE: jk2 uri mapping of SSL vhost >> >> >> >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Michael Riess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> > Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 12:52 PM >> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > Subject: jk2 uri mapping of SSL vhost >> > >> > >> > If anyone knows how to map requests from a virtual host >> > (*:443) to a context ... I would be very thankful for any hint. >> > >> > I use mod_jk2 2.0.0 with Apache 2.0.43, mapping via [uri:/xyz/*] >> > works, but mapping via [uri:*:443] doesn't do anything ... >> > >> > question: shouldn't [uri:/xyz/*] map uris from any virtual >> host, not >> > just the default one? >> >> If you declared host with >> [uri:*:443] >> Meaning any (virtual)hostname having port 443 then you have >> to specify the mapping for such host. >> >> >> Use the >> [uri:*:443/xyz/*] >> >> Since you have declared host:port combination all the uri >> mappings needs to be prefixed by that host:port. This >> behavior is intentional cause you may wish not to map any >> context on that host:port combination. >> >> >> MT. >> >> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> For >> additional commands, e-mail: >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> To >> unsubscribe, e-mail: >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> For >> additional commands, e-mail: >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> > > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
