Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Received: from nagoya.betaversion.org ([192.18.49.131]) by hume.tsdinc.steitz.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Wed, 30 Oct 2002 13:28:47 -0500 Received: (qmail 16865 invoked by uid 97); 30 Oct 2002 18:32:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:tomcat-user-subscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> List-Help: <mailto:tomcat-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 List-Post: <mailto:tomcat-user@;jakarta.apache.org> List-Id: "Tomcat Users List" <tomcat-user.jakarta.apache.org> Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 16814 invoked by uid 98); 30 Oct 2002 18:32:11 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 13:32:38 +1100 From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: achana X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: <Alias> vs <VirtualHost> - which is better for me ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Oct 2002 18:28:48.0864 (UTC) FILETIME=[30700600:01C28042]
Hi all. Both options work for me. Which is the better solution in terms of performance ? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
