Yeah, maybe that is the real problem.  The problem I discussed in my last email had 
more to do with multiple instances of Tomcat, where you want them to use the same 
jk2.properties file but different server.xml files.  Still, I think this was changed 
in 4.1.14 (or so), to just pull the values from server.xml and (possibly) ignore 
jk2.properties for now.

So if you want to use 4.1.12, make sure Catalina is finding your jk2.properties file, 
and that it has the port you wish, and multiple instances of Tomcat on the same 
machine are troublesome.

And, it will all change for 4.1.14+, I think.

Jeff Tulley  ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
(801)861-5322
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions
http://www.novell.com

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/19/02 11:01:31 AM >>>
You may need to add a jk2.properties to your conf dir...

handler.list=channelSocket,request,container
channelSocket.port=8004

Nick

On Tuesday, November 19, 2002, at 10:30 AM, Rodrigo Ruiz wrote:

> Brandom, I experienced this problem yesterday. It was a problem with my
> CATALINA_HOME variable.
>
> I was starting a Tomcat in directory A, but CATALINA_HOME was pointing 
> to
> directory B, and my CATALINA_BASE was undefined. The result: tomcat was
> being started up with the "B" configuration.
>
> Perhaps you are in the same case :_)
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brandon Cruz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 5:29 PM
> Subject: RE: Coyote Connector won't listen on port 8004, only 8009 
> (Tomcat
> 4.1.12)
>
>
>> <Connector className="org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteConnector"
>>                port="8004" minProcessors="5" maxProcessors="75"
>>                enableLookups="true" redirectPort="8443"
>>                acceptCount="10" debug="0" connectionTimeout="20000"
>>                useURIValidationHack="false"
>>
>> protocolHandlerClassName="org.apache.jk.server.JkCoyoteHandler"/>
>>
>> Even with the above configuration, this connector tries to start up on
> port
>> 8009.  Anyone know why?
>>
>>
>>
>> Brandon
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to