On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 17:05, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > I'll be working on those patches.... but the spec talks about the > > servlet container, not the connector, right? So if Tomcat has a > > container which relies on NIO it would be ok, right? And the container > > is where NIO would make the most difference. > > Don't you mean the CONNECTOR in those last two sentences?
Yes I meant connector, of course, not container. > This was, in fact, the test case for java.nio performance testing last > summer. I don't want to reiterate the entirety of the findings, but I'll > see if they are being published to the web. Summary is that switching to > java.nio didn't create miracles. Interesting. Well... one day when I have time to do it I will do some benchmarks on it to see what the real-world difference is. It may very well be that _none_ of this matters; even an inefficient Java (or perl or whatever) program can probably fill up a machine's WAN bandwidth quite easily on modern hardware. CPU/$ has improved vastly faster than WAN/$ over the past few years so maybe conserving CPU is silly now. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
