I considered your post on-Topic: I was just trying to prevent it from drifting :-). AFAIK, there are at most a couple of Apache/httpd developers subscribed to this list (and, I'm not one of them), so I just wanted any Apache/httpd related thread to jump to the httpd-users list.
Glad that I could help :-). "Denise Mangano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 5D83C44941AFD4118B6F0002B302984F4385C7@EXCHANGE_SERVER">news:5D83C44941AFD4118B6F0002B302984F4385C7@EXCHANGE_SERVER... > My apologies if I was getting off topic, but thank you for your help just > the same. I made some further permission changes, and I can now access the > html files - having a different problem and will post new thread. > > Thanks again. > Denise > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2002 10:29 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Configuring mod_jk - Again! [getting desperate] > > > You need 775 (or at least 5 on the last digit). Apache requires "x" > permissions (which, for a directory means "list" rather than "execute" on > *nix systems) on the directories. Apache will do a tree-walk from '/' to > your directory incase you have any '.htaccess' files installed. Of course, > it's [OT] to complain about this 'feature' on this list. > > That the JSPs work is not surprising, since Apache simply hands the request > off to Tomcat (which only cares about the permissions it has). > > "Denise Mangano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > 5D83C44941AFD4118B6F0002B302984F4385C6@EXCHANGE_SERVER">news:5D83C44941AFD4118B6F0002B302984F4385C6@EXCHANGE_SERVER... > > Bill, > > > > As of right now starting from my tomcat folder down, permissions are > > 774 (rwx owner and group, r other). The only variant is that my > > webapps > folder > > (including everything in it) has 775 (rwx owner and group, rx other). > What > > is odd is that the jsp files that I uploaded I can see without using > > port 8080. And these jsp's have the same permissions as the examples > > folder > and > > files within it. > > > > Also, apache runs as root - so wouldn't it have permissions? > > > > Thanks. > > Denise > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2002 9:08 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Configuring mod_jk - Again! [getting desperate] > > > > > > Apache requires at least rx permissions on all directories upto and > > including $CATALINA_HOME/webapps/examples/servlets. You have to check > > the permissions all the way up the tree. > > > > "Denise Mangano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > 5D83C44941AFD4118B6F0002B302984F4385C5@EXCHANGE_SERVER">news:5D83C44941AFD4118B6F0002B302984F4385C5@EXCHANGE_SERVER... > > > I am running Linux 7.3. I checked all relevant pages and > > > directories. > > All > > > pages are at least read by everyone. I can get to my index page no > > > problem which is in the /var/www/html directory. It is when I try > > > to access anything in Tomcat without using the port number that I > > > get this > > permissions > > > error from Apache. > > > > > > For some reason I can also access a couple of JSP pages I placed in > > > the > > ROOT > > > directory without using the port number, but nothing else. I > > > checked to > > see > > > if there were any differences in permissions between those pages, > > > and the example pages, but there aren't. In fact, all permissions > > > in Tomcat are > > 775 > > > (rwx for owner and group, rx for other). > > > > > > Thanks. > > > Denise > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Kief Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2002 7:36 AM > > > To: Tomcat Users List > > > Subject: RE: Configuring mod_jk - Again! [getting desperate] > > > > > > > > > Denise Mangano typed the following on 22:41 21/12/2002 -0500 > > > >Sorry, should have posted this... When I type in > > > >http://localhost/examples/servlets/ I now get a Forbidden message > > > >saying that I do not have permission to access > > > >/examples/servlets/index.html. This message is coming from my > > > >Apache at mydomain.com Port 80. > > > > > > > >I feel like I may be getting close, but why this? I believe Tomcat > > > >is still listening on port 8080 - does that have to be changed? > > > >Since I get this error message, I am assuming that I am getting to > > > >the files (indicating that mod_jk may possibly be working) but the > > > >files cannot be served. Permission issue in httpd.conf file or > > > >somewhere in server.xml?? > > > > > > Check permissions on the file system. If you're on Unix, Apache > > > usually > > runs > > > > > > as "nobody", so the index.html file needs to be world-readable. If > > > you're > > on > > > Windows, make sure the file isn't opened in an editor or something. > > > You shouldn't need to change Tomcat's port number, and it doesn't > > > seem likely > > it > > > would be an httpd.conf issue (and certainly not server.xml if Apache > > > is giving the error). > > > > > > Kief > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
