See, I knew there was something I didn't understand. Thanks. I'll take a look. :)
Neal -----Original Message----- From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 12:42 PM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache I gave you this link: ftp://ftp.cise.ufl.edu/pub/mirrors/redhat-contrib/libc6/i386/httpd-2.0.43-1. i386.rpm Which is the link to a Red Hat mirror that has the Apache 2.0.43 binary RPM. Any other contrib mirror will have it as well, if there is one closer to you. Installing that would upgrade your Apache to 2.0.43. There are indeed binaries (not in RPM format) for Linux on the Apache site: 1) go here: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi 2) choose a mirror site 3) on that mirror site, go to http://some.mirror.site/httpd/binaries/linux/ This is all sys-admin stuff, not really related to Tomcat at all. If you need help with RPM, I would ask on a Red Hat list or check the man pages (man rpm)...I don't use them so I can't tell you the exact command that will install it and upgrade the existing 2.0.40 at the same time. John > -----Original Message----- > From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 3:32 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache > > > Yeah ... I saw that you sent me the link for mod_jk > compatible with Apache > 2.0.43. But, I already have that. I need binaries for > either (a) Apache > 2.0.43 or (b) Mod_jk 2.0.40. In this link that you provided > there is only a > binary for Mod_jk-2.0.43. If I go to the Apache site to download > Apache-2.0.43 there are only links to (a) the source or (b) > binaries for > *Windows*!. > > I am sure I am probably missing somethinng ... please tell me > what it is?!?! > > Thanks. > Neal > > -----Original Message----- > From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 11:57 AM > To: 'Tomcat Users List' > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache > > > > There are binaries for Apache 2.0.43, all over the place. > > http://httpd.apache.org > > I gave you a link to the binary Red Hat-compatible RPM for > 2.0.43 so that > you could upgrade your RH 2.0.40 installation. > > I gave you a link to the binary for mod_jk that is compatible > with 2.0.43. > > Sorry, but I just don't see what else you need. > > John > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 2:54 PM > > To: Tomcat Users List > > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache > > > > > > Actually, I was just trying to find binaries for compatible > > versions of > > either Apache or mod_jk. So, I wanted to find either (a) > > Apache 2.0.43 or > > (b) Mod_jk 2.0.40. > > > > Perhaps its me and my phobias of doing a src build on Linux > > (which I barely > > know) but I am just not comfortable doing a src build. I > > presume I'd need to > > download and learn some C compiler to do the task ... and > > that's on top of > > barely knowing the OS! > > > > Regarding the pedantics, *IF* the current supported version > > of Apache is > > 2.0.43 ... shouldn't there be binaries for it? And even if > > not, should > > there be binaries of mod_jk for 2.0.40? It seems like an > out-of-sync > > doulbe whammy! > > > > :( > > > > Neal > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 11:40 AM > > To: 'Tomcat Users List' > > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache > > > > > > > > Sorry, you lost me. You asked for a link to mod_jk for > Apache 2.0.43, > > that's what I gave you. > > > > .43 is the supported Apache version. I don't use RPMs, but > > it should be > > fairly trivial to upgrade a RH installation with Apache > 2.0.40 to .43. > > > > Not to be pedantic, but the current "official" Apache HTTP > > release is .43, > > regardless of whether Red Hat is current or not...it seems > > reasonable to me > > that another Jakarta project would support that version and > > not earlier > > versions. > > > > For example: > > ftp://ftp.cise.ufl.edu/pub/mirrors/redhat-contrib/libc6/i386/h > > ttpd-2.0.43-1. > > i386.rpm > > > > Most RH mirrors will have it. > > > > John > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 2:20 PM > > > To: Tomcat Users List > > > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache > > > > > > > > > Yes, but when I go to the Linux dir it says > > > > > > "mod_jk-2.0.43.so is for Apache 2.0.42 (and 2.0.43) " > > > > > > It does not appear that a binary version is available that is > > > compatible > > > with Apache 2.0.40 (the version shipping with RedHat Linux 8 > > > by the way). > > > > > > I am suprised this particular build is not available. Is > > > there something I > > > am missing? :( > > > > > > Thanks. > > > Neal > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 4:44 AM > > > To: 'Tomcat Users List' > > > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache > > > > > > > > > > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/ > > > release/v1.2.2 > > > /bin/linux/i386/ > > > > > > Browse around in that tree to find others if needed. > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 8:57 PM > > > > To: Tomcat Users List > > > > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. I've never had to compile anything like this on > > > > Linux and am a > > > > little hesitant to do so (more of a windows guy to be > > > > honost). Do you know > > > > of any place that I could locate pre-compiled *compatible* > > > > binaries for > > > > either apache 2.0.43 or mod_jk 2.0.40? Or some other > > compatible set? > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > Neal > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 1:23 PM > > > > To: 'Tomcat Users List' > > > > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You need Apache 2.0.43. .42 might work, but .41 and .40 won't. > > > > > > > > Or, you can build your own. > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:50 PM > > > > To: Tomcat Users List > > > > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache > > > > > > > > > > > > Does anyone know why I would get this error when installing > > > > mod_JK 2.0.43 on > > > > Linux 8, with Tomcat 4.1 and Apache 2.0: > > > > > > > > "mod_jk.c not compatible with this version of Apache". > > > > > > > > I presume that when it refers to the "mod_jk.c" it is > > > referring to the > > > > cmopuled code it derives from the LoadModule command to load > > > > the so (?). > > > > > > > > I downloaded the mod_jk-2.0.43.so from the Apache connectors > > > > archives. I > > > > just used the same version (but as a DLL) successfully on > > my windows > > > > workstation. > > > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > Neal > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 1:36 PM > > > > To: Tomcat Users List > > > > Subject: RE: Mod_JK - JkMount Invalid Command > > > > > > > > > > > > John, > > > > > > > > Your tutorial ROCKS! > > > > > > > > It turns out there were 4 distinct problems which I was able > > > > to identify in > > > > part by using the Apache.exe and in part by comparing your > > > > steps to the > > > > collage I had compiled from other incomplete sources. > > > > > > > > My primary problem was that mod_jk.dll was not being > > recognized so I > > > > replaced it with the build you were using > > > > (mod_jk-2.0.43.dll) and from there is was pretty much home free! > > > > > > > > Now on to doing the same on the Linux server (I hope its > > reasonably > > > > similar). :) > > > > > > > > Thanks again. > > > > Neal > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:22 AM > > > > To: 'Tomcat Users List' > > > > Subject: RE: Mod_JK - JkMount Invalid Command > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Uncomment those two lines. > > > > > > > > Then, open up a command window and call Apache like this: > > > > > > > > SOME_DRIVE:\SOME\PATH\TO\APACHE\BIN\APACHE.EXE -t > > > > > > > > This will check the syntax of Apache's httpd.conf without > > > > starting Apache. > > > > Fix the errors, then call it with "-t" again until you see > > > > "Syntax OK". > > > > > > > > The whole process is described in my HOWTO: > > > > http://www.johnturner.com/howto/winxp-howto.html > > > > > > > > While the version I use in my HOWTO is 4.1.18, the > > > > configuration steps are > > > > identical, just substitute "4.0.4" wherever you see "4.1.18". > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 2:17 PM > > > > > To: Tomcat Users List > > > > > Subject: Mod_JK - JkMount Invalid Command > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm trying to setup ModJK for the first time between > > > Apache 2.0 and > > > > > TOmcat 4.0.4, on Windows 2000. > > > > > > > > > > I am stuck with an error I was hoping someone might recognize: > > > > > > > > > > It tells me "invliad JKMount command. Perhaps mispelled or > > > > defined by > > > > > a module not included in the server configuration". > > > > > > > > > > I presume this is because I have commented out these lines: > > > > > > > > > > #LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so > > > > > #AddModule mod_jk.c > > > > > > > > > > But if I *DONT* comment these out, the test > configuration window > > > > > disappears almost as quickly as it appears and I can't > > > see what the > > > > > problem is. There > > > > > is nothing being logged, and if I try to start from the > > > > Apache Service > > > > > manager I simply get a message stating "The requested > > > > > operation failed.". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyone know what's going on? :( > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > Neal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > --- > > > > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > > Version: 6.0.443 / Virus Database: 248 - Release Date: 1/10/2003 > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > > Version: 6.0.443 / Virus Database: 248 - Release Date: 1/10/2003 > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
