On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Joe Tomcat wrote:
> Date: 01 Feb 2003 18:38:50 -0800 > From: Joe Tomcat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: more about custam tag life cycle > > On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 11:00, Will Hartung wrote: > > And like I said earlier, it would be nice if there were a pool interface > > added to the lifecycle to clean up the tag processing to make optional > > properties more portable and easier to write for. > > It would be even nicer if the pool were dropped entirely and if instead > of having a bunch of setter methods, the tag constructor took a map of > arguments. Object pooling is deprecated, except for expensive objects > like db connections. Tags are generally very cheap objects because they > only contain a few simple instance fields. I would be surprised if tag > pooling actually has any positive performance impact compared to > creating new objects, on a contemporary JVM. > Go get the JSP 2.0 PFD2 spec ... you'll undoubtedly like it :-). Craig --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
