Hi RK,
I thought my workers.properties file looked very different
from everybody else's using mod_jk2 !!!!!
I just checked again and realize I misread the page
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk2/confighowto.html
I actually put the following in jk2.properties instead of in
workers2.properties -
_jk2.properties____________________
# Define the communication channel
[channel.socket:localhost:8009]
info=Ajp13 forwarding over socket
tomcatId=localhost:8009
# Map the Tomcat examples webapp to the Web server uri space
[uri:/examples/*]
info=Map the whole webapp
----------------------------------
and the really strange thing is that it all worked !!!!
My workers.properties looks very different from everybody
else's but it also works fine
_workers.properties___________________________
worker.list=worker1
# Set properties for worker1 (ajp13)
worker.worker1.type=ajp13
worker.worker1.host=localhost
worker.worker1.port=8009
worker.worker1.lbfactor=50
worker.worker1.cachesize=10
worker.worker1.cache_timeout=600
worker.worker1.socket_keepalive=1
worker.worker1.socket_timeout=3
----------------------------------------------
Is the mod_jk2.so backwards compatible ?
I'm also using the mod_jk-1.3-noeapi.so file from
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.1/bin/solaris8/
which was linked from the jk2 FAQ
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/faq.html
Or is the link in the FAQ incorrect ?
It's going to hurt if I've somehow managed to use mod_jk1 as
opposed to mod_jk2 :(
Soefara.
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the way there... Soefara Redzuan
- Re: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the ... ramakrishna
- Re: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the ... Soefara Redzuan
- Re: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the ... Soefara Redzuan
- RE: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the ... Turner, John
- RE: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the ... Turner, John
- RE: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the ... Turner, John
- RE: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the ... Barney Hamish
- RE: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the ... pqin
