No, the ideal would be faster and more stable :) Just some statements from Sun: The Java HoSpot Client VM ... it is tuned for best performance ... by reducing application start-up time and memory footprint.
The Java HotSpot Server VM is designed for maximum program execution speed. (In other words you buy speed by paying with memory) Some theory behind that is here: http://java.sun.com/docs/hotspot/gc/index.html Having a closer look at http://java.sun.com/docs/hotspot/VMOptions.html indicates that a vm that uses the -server option is quite a different beast than the one with the -client option. > -----Original Message----- > From: Sven K�hler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 5:46 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: tomcat 4.1.18 locks up > > > > The mosts posts in this list indicate that the server > > option is not a good option. It's faster, but also > > less stable. > > shouldn't it be the other way round? > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
