Thanks john.  Does this error come from a problem in the workers.properties
file, or an entry in the httpd.conf do you know?

 It seems that mod_jk finds the match fine in the httpd.conf file, but then
when tries to use a worker it for some reason can not.  I have debug on but
am missing the piece that it is specifically dying on.

 thanks again for the help.

Adam

On 3/3/03 8:50 AM, "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> No other ideas, really.  In the past, problems like this have come down to
> something really simple, such as using an el ("l") instead of a one ("1") in
> "ajp13" and other typo-related problems (or permission problems).  My
> eyesight isn't as good as it used to be, but it looks like you have "ajp13"
> typed out correctly in all the places where it needs to be.
> 
> John
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 8:24 AM
>> To: Tomcat Users List
>> Subject: Re: mod_jk error
>> 
>> 
>> Hmm, tried that but still no luck.
>> 
>>  I still get the following
>> 
>>  [Mon Mar 03 08:16:00 2003]  [jk_uri_worker_map.c (477)]:
>> Attempting to map
>> URI '/examples/jsp/dates/date.jsp'
>> 
>>  [Mon Mar 03 08:16:00 2003]  [jk_uri_worker_map.c (558)]:
>> jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, Found a suffix match
>> ajp13 -> *.jsp
>> 
>> [Mon Mar 03 08:16:00 2003]  [jk_worker.c (132)]: Into
>> wc_get_worker_for_name
>> ajp13
>> 
>> [Mon Mar 03 08:16:00 2003]  [jk_worker.c (136)]:
>> wc_get_worker_for_name,
>> done did not found a worker
>> 
>> Using a very simple workers.properties file.
>> 
>> worker.list=ajp13
>> worker.ajp13.port=8009
>> worker.ajp13.host=localhost
>> worker.ajp13.type=ajp13
>> 
>>   any other suggestions?  I am totally out of ideas as to
>> what is causing
>> this error..
>>  
>>  thanks
>> Adam
>> 
>> 
>> On 3/3/03 8:06 AM, "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Try deleting the "lbfactor" line from your
>> workers.properties file.  It's
>>> not necessary when you only have one worker defined, and it
>> may be causing
>>> confusion to mod_jk.so.
>>> 
>>> John
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 8:36 PM
>>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Subject: mod_jk error
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I have been digging everywhere and can not find the answer to
>>>> this error
>>>> that I am getting.
>>>> 
>>>>  Has anyone seen this error, and resolved it, or found the
>> root of its
>>>> cause?
>>>> 
>>>>  [Fri Feb 28 21:13:27 2003]  [jk_worker.c (136)]:
>>>> wc_get_worker_for_name,
>>>> done did not found a worker
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Adam
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to