Thanks john. Does this error come from a problem in the workers.properties
file, or an entry in the httpd.conf do you know?
It seems that mod_jk finds the match fine in the httpd.conf file, but then
when tries to use a worker it for some reason can not. I have debug on but
am missing the piece that it is specifically dying on.
thanks again for the help.
Adam
On 3/3/03 8:50 AM, "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No other ideas, really. In the past, problems like this have come down to
> something really simple, such as using an el ("l") instead of a one ("1") in
> "ajp13" and other typo-related problems (or permission problems). My
> eyesight isn't as good as it used to be, but it looks like you have "ajp13"
> typed out correctly in all the places where it needs to be.
>
> John
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 8:24 AM
>> To: Tomcat Users List
>> Subject: Re: mod_jk error
>>
>>
>> Hmm, tried that but still no luck.
>>
>> I still get the following
>>
>> [Mon Mar 03 08:16:00 2003] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (477)]:
>> Attempting to map
>> URI '/examples/jsp/dates/date.jsp'
>>
>> [Mon Mar 03 08:16:00 2003] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (558)]:
>> jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, Found a suffix match
>> ajp13 -> *.jsp
>>
>> [Mon Mar 03 08:16:00 2003] [jk_worker.c (132)]: Into
>> wc_get_worker_for_name
>> ajp13
>>
>> [Mon Mar 03 08:16:00 2003] [jk_worker.c (136)]:
>> wc_get_worker_for_name,
>> done did not found a worker
>>
>> Using a very simple workers.properties file.
>>
>> worker.list=ajp13
>> worker.ajp13.port=8009
>> worker.ajp13.host=localhost
>> worker.ajp13.type=ajp13
>>
>> any other suggestions? I am totally out of ideas as to
>> what is causing
>> this error..
>>
>> thanks
>> Adam
>>
>>
>> On 3/3/03 8:06 AM, "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Try deleting the "lbfactor" line from your
>> workers.properties file. It's
>>> not necessary when you only have one worker defined, and it
>> may be causing
>>> confusion to mod_jk.so.
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 8:36 PM
>>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Subject: mod_jk error
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have been digging everywhere and can not find the answer to
>>>> this error
>>>> that I am getting.
>>>>
>>>> Has anyone seen this error, and resolved it, or found the
>> root of its
>>>> cause?
>>>>
>>>> [Fri Feb 28 21:13:27 2003] [jk_worker.c (136)]:
>>>> wc_get_worker_for_name,
>>>> done did not found a worker
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Adam
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]