The specific problem I am having with IIS and Tomcat is... I'm trying to run a Statistics Program I wrote in java. It seems there is a problem that if I specify a default file ie http://www.mywebsite.com/index.jsp in IIS while pointing to the home directory of tomcat\webapps\mywebsite\index.jsp
THE CATCH IS ... I cant use any type of redirector because I am trying to get the REFERER URL from the default file index.jsp . Otherwise I could just use a meta tag to redirect to the jsp file. If I use http://www.mywebsite.com/mywebsite/index.jsp the JSP functionality works. If I use http://www.mywebsite.com - with a top file set as index.jsp and the home directory of /mywebsites in IIS the JSP functionality is gone. EVEN THOUGH THEY ARE BOTH POINTING TO THE SAME PLACE ???? I've been TOLD it can't be done and to use tomcat and apache. I don't understand if they are both pointing to the same place why jsp does not work ? -wiley This issue of Tomcat and Apache comes up over and over and over again on the list here because everyone tells everyone else that they should run Apache in front of Tomcat without understanding what the person is doing. There are definitely reasons for this (which have been discussed more than many times), but I have *never* seen anyone give _conclusive_ *performance-centric* proof for this. I agree -- conceptually it gives you performance boost after some activity threshold, but I surmise that the *large majority* of people out there aren't even close to this threshold. It seems to me that it's more of a "common knowledge" thing than anything. The more often something is repeated, the more likely it will become defacto truth. In fact, our app supports connections both through a proxy (IIS or Apache) *and* directly to Tomcat because response times are very important to us and the turnaround going through Apache is ~100ms while the turnaround directly to Tomcat is ~20ms. Tomcat is an excellent HTTP server. It easily supports the requirements of most projects out there. IMHO, using Tomcat as Http server should be the default and Apache should only be used if you have a specific reason to use it (of which there are many very real, very valid ones, some of which Jeffrey Peloquin, amongst others, have mentioned in this thread). My point in writing this is that we should all be careful what we suggest before understanding what exactly the person needs. And, quite frankly, those asking should find these threads *easily* with a little effort. ;) justin At 03:26 PM 3/27/2003, you wrote: >What if the majority of your pages are either servlets or JSP. I have only a >couple pages that are not dynamically created, so Apache will only handle >those, right? I'm running in a pure Tomcat environment because of this... >and the fact I don't know how to set up apache with tomcat :-) > >-Brian > >-----Original Message----- >From: Jeremy Whitlock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 3:23 PM >To: 'Tomcat Users List' >Subject: RE: Tomcat and IIS > > >That's possible BUT performance will suffer. Tomcat isn't as powerful >as Apache. If you are running a small website, intranet and such, >Tomcat would probably work fine but it's not Commercially fit as a Web >Server. Apache on the other hand is. Later, J ____________________________________ Justin Ruthenbeck Software Engineer, NextEngine Inc. justinr - AT - nextengine DOT com Confidential See http://www.nextengine.com/confidentiality.php ____________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
