Well, I don't have to create pages under ROOT as you did, but that's a
separate issue from what I'm asking.



----- Original Message -----
From: "Carol Carrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: ?? Simple Newbie Question about Root Context ??


> Although I am really a newbie, I have the same o/s system.  I have trouble
> loading my pages until I created them under the ROOT path and uncommented
> the section you are referring to.  Here is a good web reference.
> http://www.moreservlets.com/Using-Tomcat-4.html
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tony LaPaso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Tomcat User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 4:00 PM
> Subject: ?? Simple Newbie Question about Root Context ??
>
>
> > My Tomcat skills are rusty -- I must be missing something easy here.
> >
> > I just installed TC v4.1.24 on Win 2k. The installation worked right out
> of
> > the box. I didn't have to make any changes to the server.xml. TC is up
and
> > running but I'm seeing something strange I was hoping someone could
> explain:
> >
> >
> > Here's a quote from the TC documentation: "...you MUST define a Context
> with
> > a context path equal to a zero-length string. This Context becomes the
> > default web application for this virtual host, and is used to process
all
> > requests that do not match any other Context's context path."
> >
> > Okay, that's fine, but when I look at conf/server.xml I see this:
> >
> > <!-- Tomcat Root Context -->
> > <!--
> >     <Context path="" docBase="ROOT" debug="0"/>
> > -->
> >
> >
> > Why is this commented out? According to the documentation there must be
a
> > "context path equal to a zero-length string". The quote I cited seems to
> > contradict what I'm seeing in server.xml.
> >
> > Even though this is commented out everything seems to work fine. In
other
> > words, if I browse to localhost:8080 I do indeed see
> webapps/ROOT/index.jsp.
> > Is the docBase named "ROOT" the default? If so, then the documentation
> > should mention that I think.
> >
> > Thanks very much,
> >
> > Tony
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to