John, Actually, the virtual hosts were hard coded in my mod_jk.conf file. I changed that to be:
NameVirtualHost * <VirtualHost *> ServerName www.ptp.com ... </VirtualHost *> <VirtualHost *> ServerName test.ptp.com ... </VirtualHost *> This seemed to get rid of the conflict on port 80. I changed the SSL virtual host to be for *:443 for the live site and just * for the test site, and this seemed to get rid of the conflict. However, I am still getting the error opening workers. Thanks, Denise -----Original Message----- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 2:13 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Strange mod_jk error OK, that tells me that you have multiple VirtualHosts going on, which means that you probably have multiple/conflicting JkMount and workers. Probably, there is a hard-coded VirtualHost in httpd.conf, in addition to the definitions being included from mod_jk.conf. That would explain (possibly) some of the problems you are experiencing...for example, the configuration you want is the second one, but only the first is being used by Apache, or vice versa. "configtest" should return "Syntax OK". John On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 12:58:26 -0400, Denise Mangano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well it throws me two warnings: > > [Tue Jun 3 11:16:23 2003] [warn] VirtualHost www.ptp.com:80 overlaps > with > VirtualHost test.ptp.com:80, the first has precedence, perhaps you need a > NameVirtualHost directive [Tue Jun 3 11:16:23 2003] [warn] VirtualHost > www.ptp.com:443 overlaps with > VirtualHost test.ptp.com:443, the first has precedence, perhaps you need > a > NameVirtualHost directive > > I'm in the process of trying to get this problem worked out. Other > than this, the syntax is OK. > > Denise > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, > June > 03, 2003 12:45 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: Strange mod_jk error > > > > A "configtest" of Apache returns "Syntax OK"? > > John > > On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 12:50:25 -0400, Denise Mangano > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Those lines are at the top of my mod_jk.conf (the one I edited) and >> my >> Include statement points to my version of the mod_jk.conf. >> >> This is a strange problem, I've searched the archives but can't seem >> to find a fix. Whats worse is that it doesn't give more detail on >> the error, for >> example what file and line the error occurs on... >> >> Denise >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, >> June >> 03, 2003 12:18 PM >> To: Tomcat Users List >> Subject: Re: Strange mod_jk error >> >> >> >> The mod_jk.conf file isn't getting used unless there is an Include >> directive in httpd.conf to include it. >> >> Make sure you have these lines somewhere, either hard-coded in >> httpd.conf, or at the top of your mod_jk.conf file: >> >> JkWorkersFile "/path/to/workers.properties" >> JkLogFile "/path/to/mod_jk.log" >> JkLogLevel emerg >> >> John >> >> On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 12:05:09 -0400, Denise Mangano >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> I noticed that having the worker named worker wasn't the smartest >>> thing, so I changed it to worker1 and still got the same problem. >>> >>> Now the strange thing is, I did not have an include statement in my >>> httpd.conf. I had originally set this up a while ago, so to be >>> honest I am not sure why I didn't have it there, because I remember >>> putting it in when I followed your how-to. So this means that I >>> have been using the auto generated mod_jk.conf (is that right?). >>> >>> I tried to 1) change the worker name to ajp13 and 2) include the >>> edited mod_jk.conf. I am still getting the error message when I >>> start up apache stating that there was an error opening the workers >>> and jk will not work. When I try to access a jsp page I still get >>> the same error message in my mod_jk.log stating that it is looking >>> for worker ajp13, but the worker is not found. It appears that the >>> actual problem is opening the workers.properties... The system finds >>> it, sets the rules, attempts the matches the URI request, and >>> eventually finds a context match for the worker. The problem is >>> when looking for the >> worker it does not see it. >>> It >>> would make sense that this would happen since Apache is having >>> trouble >>> opening the workers.properties file. The strange thing is that Apache >>> is also stating there is "No such file or directory" but the file is in >>> fact >>> there, and all the paths pointing to it are correct. >>> >>> Any other suggestions? Should I maybe post my files? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Denise >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, >>> June 03, 2003 9:59 AM >>> To: Tomcat Users List >>> Subject: Re: Strange mod_jk error >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 09:51:14 -0400, Denise Mangano >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> 1) It is possible that I am still using the auto generated >>>> mod_jk.conf file >>>> - which would have worked previously when I had one default host >>>> set >>>> up, >>>> but >>>> will not work now that I have added in the virtual hosts? How can I >>>> check >>>> this to make sure that I am using my version of mod_jk.conf found in >>>> /tomcat/conf and not the auto generated one in /tomcat/conf/auto? The >>>> problem with this possibility is that I get this error message when >>>> trying >>>> either Virtual Host (even the one that is in the generated >>>> mod_jk.conf) . >>> >>> There's no way to check, as far as I know. It would be based on the >>> Include statement in httpd.conf. Is it possible that your Apache >>> restart didn't actually happen? Sometimes the "restart" option doesn't >>> behave...I have more luck actually shutting Apache down, then starting >>> it back up. >>> >>>> >>>> 2) The permissions are wrong on the workers.properties file: >>>> permissions are read everyone, write owner >>> >>> I doubt this is a problem, 644 should be fine. >>> >>>> 3) The workers.properties specifies the host as localhost: will >>>> this >>>> work with virtual hosts? >>> >>> Yes...the .host parameter is the location of the machine hosting the >>> Tomcat instance, not any sort of virtual host or other server >>> name/address. >>> >>>> 4) I do not have the connectors configured right: The connectors >>>> configured are the original defaults so I don't think this is the >>>> problem. >>> >>> I agree. >>> >>>> Do any of these sound like valid possibilities? Or is there >>>> something I am missing. I appreciate all your help. >>> >>> #1 sounds pretty good. The other thing I noticed, on reviewing your >>> earlier posts, is that your worker is named "worker". My gut feeling >>> tells me that's bad. Try changing it to "ajp13" for the sake of >>> debugging. >>> >>> John >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: >>>> Tuesday, >>>> June 03, 2003 8:16 AM >>>> To: Tomcat Users List >>>> Subject: Re: Strange mod_jk error >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I think the problem is that, in the .properties files you posted, >>>> you have the port as 8080. That's the HTTP port...the JK port is >>>> 8009. >>>> >>>> John >>>> >>>> On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 23:37:04 -0400, Denise Mangano >>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I decided to scratch having the second worker since my problems >>>>> seemed >>>>> to start with that approach. I restored everything to the original >>>>> worker file and have both default and test virtual hosts pointing to >>>>> the same workers.properties. >>>>> >>>>> For some reason, mod_jk is still not working. Its not a problem >>>>> with >>>>> Tomcat itself because I can access everything on port 8080. Apache >>>>> throws an internal server error every time I try to access a jsp >>>>> without the port in the URL. >>>>> >>>>> The error in the apache error log is: >>>>> [Mon Jun 2 23:04:59 2003] [error] Error while opening the >>>>> workers, >>>>> jk will not work [Mon Jun 2 23:05:01 2003] [error] (2)No such file >>>>> or directory: Error while >>>>> opening the workers, jk will not work >>>>> >>>>> The error in mod_jk.log is: >>>>> [Mon Jun 02 23:01:47 2003] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (558)]: >>>>> jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, Found a suffix match >>>>> worker - >>>>> > *.jsp [Mon Jun 02 23:01:47 2003] [jk_worker.c (132)]: Into >>>>> wc_get_worker_for_name worker >>>>> [Mon Jun 02 23:01:47 2003] [jk_worker.c (136)]: >>>>> wc_get_worker_for_name, >>>>> done did not found a worker >>>>> >>>>> Content of my worker file is: >>>>> worker.list = worker >>>>> worker.worker.type = ajp13 >>>>> worker.worker.host = localhost >>>>> worker.worker.port = 8009 >>>>> >>>>> My JkMount statements are like this: JkMount /*.jsp worker >>>>> >>>>> I'd appreciate any help on this. It has put me in a pretty >>>>> serious bind, and I can't for the life of me figure out why it >>>>> won't work. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Denise >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Denise Mangano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: >>>>> Monday, >>>>> June 02, 2003 4:56 PM >>>>> To: 'Tomcat Users List' >>>>> Subject: RE: Strange mod_jk error >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> By "some configuration changes" I added in virtual hosting. That >>>>> error message is gone. I'm not exactly sure what I did to get it >>>>> to 'go away' but it did. The problem I am having is that my >>>>> worker is not being found. >>>>> >>>>> I have two properties files defined. One is workers.properties >>>>> for use with the default virtual host, and one is >>>>> test.workers.properties to use with my >>>>> testing virtual host. I tried combining each into one >>>>> workers.properties >>>>> file but still get the same error message. The suffix is matched, >>>>> but when >>>>> it looks for the worker named testWorker it doesn't fin it: >>>>> >>>>> [Mon Jun 02 16:16:57 2003] [jk_worker.c (132)]: Into >>>>> wc_get_worker_for_name testWorker [Mon Jun 02 16:16:57 2003] >>>>> [jk_worker.c (136)]: wc_get_worker_for_name, done did not found a >>>>> worker >>>>> >>>>> My test.workers.properties file looks like: >>>>> worker.list = testWorker >>>>> worker.testWorker.type = ajp13 >>>>> worker.testWorker.host = test.mysite.com worker.testWorker.port = >>>>> 8080 >>>>> >>>>> My test.workers.properties file looks like: >>>>> worker.list = worker >>>>> worker.worker.type = ajp13 >>>>> worker.worker.host = www.mysite.com >>>>> worker.worker.port = 8080 >>>>> >>>>> My server.xml, mod_jk.conf and httpd.conf both point to the >>>>> appropriate worker properties file within each virtual host. I am >>>>> in the process of going over all my config files to see if I >>>>> missed anything, but it appears that everything is configured >>>>> right. Mod_jk is doing its job - but for some reason it is not >>>>> finding the definition of the named worker. >>>>> >>>>> Any suggestion? I can post my files if necessary. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for taking a look! >>>>> Denise >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: >>>>> Monday, >>>>> June 02, 2003 4:10 PM >>>>> To: Tomcat Users List >>>>> Subject: Re: Strange mod_jk error >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> As far as I know, that error message is socket related, as in the >>>>> socket is closed, or Apache thinks the socket is closed when it >>>>> isn't. >>>>> >>>>> Its pretty old, from what I know, and should be fixed in recent >>>>> incarnations of mod_jk. Then again, you are using Apache 1.3.23, >>>>> so maybe that error still crops up. >>>>> >>>>> Verify that your workers.properties has the right port number, >>>>> verify >>>>> that it has the right host, and verify that you don't have any >>>>> workers configured (like ajp12 or ajp14) that you don't need. >>>>> >>>>> Other than that, you'll have to explain further what you mean by >>>>> "some configuration changes". ;) >>>>> >>>>> John >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 16:09:26 -0400, Denise Mangano >>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi all. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have not posted in some time as thanks to some great help from >>>>>> this >>>>>> list my application was running smoothly. However, I needed to make >>>>>> some configuration changes, and now my apps stopped working. Apache >>>>>> (1.3.23) runs fine, and Tomcat (4.1.17) runs fine but the problem is >>>>>> with mod_jk. >>>>>> >>>>>> I tried searching the archives for this one but had no luck. The >>>>>> error I am getting in my mod_jk.log is: >>>>>> >>>>>> In jk_endpoint_t::service, Error sd = -1 >>>>>> >>>>>> And of course the error I am getting in my apache error log shows >>>>>> that it is looking for the file in the apache web directory. So >>>>>> it appears that mod_jk >>>>>> is not working and the request is never being interpreted by the >>>>>> JkMount >>>>>> statements. >>>>>> >>>>>> Does anyone have any idea what this means? I even tried >>>>>> restoring the original server.xml file, but I still received the >>>>>> error. I can post server.xml, httpd.conf, etc if you need to see >>>>>> it, but I thought first I would send out the error message. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for your help! >>>>>> >>>>>> Denise Mangano >>>>>> Help Desk Analyst >>>>>> Complus Data Innovations, Inc. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> - >>>>>> - >>>>>> - >>>>>> - >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
