Tetsuo Handa wrote: > OK. I reconsidered the specification a bit. > > ... > > Both "namespace <$namespace>" line and "namespace <$namespace>" prefix are > hidden from users when browsing/editing via ccs-editpolicy . Also, we can make > "namespace <$namespace>" prefix omissible when we use only <kernel> namespace. > > The "namespace <$namespace>" line and the "namespace <$namespace>" prefix, > which do you like to use?
Prefix looks like a good approach to me. > Well, the "namespace <$namespace>" line/prefix for /proc/ccs/manager might be > confusing. But do we want to specify different manager programs/domains for > different namespace at all? Is namespace for /proc/ccs/manager useful? It would be good to get an opinion on this from someone who uses namespaces/containers regularly. I personally don't see much benefit from splitting manager.conf for each namespace. It is simpler just to keep the same manager programs for all namespaces. _______________________________________________ tomoyo-dev-en mailing list tomoyo-dev-en@lists.sourceforge.jp http://lists.sourceforge.jp/mailman/listinfo/tomoyo-dev-en
