Toshiharu Harada wrote: > My understanding of initialize_domain is resetting the domain, > which occurs in the existing "namespace". > Personally, I prefer the new directive for "namespace" to imply > creating/changing to a different "namespace". > For example, change_namespace or transit_namespace, instead of > initialize_namespace (I can live with initialize_namespace, though).
Hmm, I see your point. My main reason for suggesting initialize_namespace was to reduce the "overhead" on remembering many different directives. We already have "file read foo" so I thought "initialize_foo" might be appropriate. But I don't really mind either way. I can live with transit_namespace. _______________________________________________ tomoyo-dev-en mailing list tomoyo-dev-en@lists.sourceforge.jp http://lists.sourceforge.jp/mailman/listinfo/tomoyo-dev-en
