I am using TWiki because it was easy to set up and powerful for what it
is, but my goal is to make a J2EE wiki that I like, using what is in
DevWiki and QWiki and CHiki as a starting point.  I will probably try
to make a wiki that has the functionality of TWiki but in J2EE with a
decoupled persistence mechanism.  Perl, bleccccchhhhh...

-Tom

On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 00:09:53 -0500
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:    Non-member submission from [Frank
>     Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
>
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 17 00:09:52 2002
> Received: from mail3.centurytel.net (mail3.centurytel.net [209.142.136.99])
>       by toms.net (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g0H59qik010072
>       for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 00:09:52 -0500
> Received: from aSqueakSystem (pppoe0101.sm.centurytel.net [209.142.160.230])
>       by mail3.centurytel.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g0H59oD14984
>       for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 23:09:51 -0600 (CST)
> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Mailer: Celeste 2.0.4599
> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 23:07:55 -0600
> Subject: Re: [tomsrtbt] wikiwiki
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: Frank Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Tom Oehser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Tom, I am concerned about integrity of documentation, and am skeptical
> > > on that point.
> >
> > Well, the wikis I am investigating all have easy RCS or CVS or similar
>
> That would seem to do it.  Also, the Swiki (Squeak Wiki) keeps every
> version of every page so (I understand) it is easy to revert to a
> previous good copy if someone accidentally or maliciously destroys a
> page.
>
> > version control built in, the ability to require users to be registered,
> > and the ability for an author to limit update access to pages they create-
> > it _sounds_ like it might be workable.
>
> Registered might not be too bad, but updating only your own pages seems
> contrary to the wiki "spirit".  I think we'd be better off taking
> chances (but keeping the fallback versions for protection).  You could
> see http://swiki.net for examples of some swikis they host or
> http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak.1 for the main Squeak swiki.  I found
> the most recent swiki very easy to install.  On the other hand, the very
> prettiest wiki I have seen is the Common Lisp wiki, CLiki at
> http://ww.telent.net/cliki/CLiki.
>
> > But it is _very_ tempting that the mailing list archives could be
> > cross-indexed and re-factored and linked-up so that it ends up being a set
> > of topics and cross links, rather than just a pile you can search through.
>
> I agree this would be great, especially if you automate the link
> creation.  I've been finding it a bit tedious (in my documentation wiki
> I mentioned in my previous email) to incorporate some previously written
> materials into the wiki structure.  Two things I particularly like about
> wikis are (1) the ability to see a list of recent changes and (2) the
> built in search function which shows a list of wiki pages containing
> your search string.
>
>
> -- Frank
>

Reply via email to