On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 11:00:29PM -0400, Tom Oehser wrote:
> 
> As far as I can tell, the meaningful differences that happenstance
> brought, between 1 and 2, as listed below.  Please tell me what you
> think should go back in- there is lots of space I have freed up, and
> more coming, but, I need feedback on what people are actually using.

I use ppa.o on my application, and would like to have emacs.

I could, if necessary, read up on vi. Or if emacs were made available
separately I could put it on my zip disks as I build them.

But I have to have ppa on the tomsrtbt floppy so I can get to the zip
disk.

Or I could stick with tomsrtbt-1.7.366, which does just fine.

Thanks.

-- 

Charles Curley                  /"\    ASCII Ribbon Campaign
Looking for fine software       \ /    Respect for open standards
and/or writing?                  X     No HTML/RTF in email
http://w3.trib.com/~ccurley     / \    No M$ Word docs in email

Attachment: msg01306/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to