Ah. I see the problem.
The "mount -t smbfs" wrapper doesn't work, but "smbmount" directly does work. When I do "mount -t smbfs //host /mountpoint -o options", it fails with the 'need mount version 6' message. When I do 'smbmount //host /mountpoint -o options', I get NLS codepage warnings, but it works. Try with smbmount directly. -Tom On Fri, 10 May 2002, Stephane Boireau wrote: > Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 11:38:05 +0200 > From: Stephane Boireau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [tomsrtbt] Smbmount et Tomsrtbt2.0.103... > > Hi, > > I do the whole test again, trying to access a shared directory on a > linux/samba PDC box and to another share on a winMe box without password for > the second. > > I did the links as I told in my last mail. > > I wait a few minutes between two smbmount test. > ... > Nothing... > > I tried another thing: > "smbmount -h" tells that we can do > "mount -t smbfs -o username=myname,password=mypassword //pc16/public /mnt/smb4" > But what I get is: > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on //pc16/public, > or too many mounted file systems > SMBFS: need mount version 6 > Is there something with the "mount" version? > > After that, to be sure I'm not fool, I try again with Tomsrtbt1.7... and > everything is all right. > > It doesn't solve the problem, but it's fine to success smbmounting shares... > > Thank you for the help you give, and the great job you do. > > Bye. > ********************************************* > St�phane Boireau, personne ressource TICE > [EMAIL PROTECTED] au coll�ge Le Hameau, > 1 rue Albert Schweitzer, BP 851, 27308 BERNAY > ********************************************* >
