Either place will work, this is probably better for isolated bugs, the wikiwiki is probably better for discussion of desired enhancements and feature set changes and compromises. -Tom
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Guentcho Skordev wrote: > Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 18:12:27 +0100 > From: Guentcho Skordev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tom Oehser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [tomsrtbt] Errors in 2.0.103? (Re: 1.7.91?) > > Hello again, > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 06:02:29PM -0500, Tom Oehser wrote: > > These are busybox problems, I am retesting now with a newer version of > > busybox, that I think at least fixes the gzip problem. -Tom > > Some other programs show similar errors. > > I have also noticed that I often run into trouble if I don't add swap space > at the beginning (I have 8 MB of RAM). > > Is the right place to report about problems or errors here in the list > or in the Wikiwiki -> Bugs -> Possiblebugs (I think I have to register > there before)? > > > On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Guentcho Skordev wrote: > > > Subject: [tomsrtbt] Errors in 2.0.103? (Re: 1.7.91?) > > > On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 06:08:37PM +0100, Guentcho Skordev wrote: > > > > Some time ago (maybe not more than a month ago?) I have downloaded > > > > tomsrtbt 1.7.91, I don't know from anymore which site (is there a > > > > version history?). There were some problems: > > Actually, I have downloaded 2.0.103 twice. The first time I thought it > was 1.7.91 because this the number that stays in the "tomsrtbt.lsm" > file in the DOS zip archive is wrong. > > Title: tomsrtbt > Version: 1.7.91 > Entered-date: 10DEC98 > Description: "The most Linux on one floppy." (distribution > or panic disk). > [...] > > Regards > Guentcho > > P.S. One really unimportant note: ddate has problems with 1st of March > in leap years (problem in 2004, 2008 etc.) and also thinks 1900 and > 2100 are leap. >
