> my old computer needs tulip eth0-module may be I'am wrong but were is it, > I can't find?
The tulip driver is hard-linked into the kernel, there is no need for a module, it is already there, for the normal DEC tulip. Now, > The /var/log/kern.log from an installed woody talks about a > tulip0 and Davicom DM9102/DM9102A rev 49 so I am looking for it. I find > some old dicussion from 1998 about it. I dunno what a Davicom DM9102/DM9102A rev 49 is, if it uses the regular tulip driver, it should work fine. > and a short 2. one ... witch version is the ksh and is it a "normal" > one ore in some ways smaler? The shell is ash. It is very compatible with sh/ksh/bash/bournish shell scripts. It does not have the ksh interactivity niceties. It is augmented with ile for some input line editing (command history et al.). For syntax and scripts, it will run almost 100% of ksh stuff. Certainly it is smaller than bash, or, I presume, ksh, though the real ksh is not free software, and I don't use the pdksh clone, I see ksh more often in Solaris or HP-UX, on Linux it is bash, not ksh, that is the reference point. -Tom
