> >I am more interested, really, in hearing *why* you want to > >replace ash+ile with bash- ash is very very good with bourne > >shell scripts as far as compatability, and ile gives you the > >rudiments of interactive nicities- is there some particular > >feature of bash that is worth it? > > Command line completion is what I miss most.
The ile does have this, it is just different, quirky and incomplete, see "man ile" under tomsrtbt and play with it. > Occasionally ile fights with vi (vi seems to be acting strangely > and ESC does not return it from input mode to command mode) Hmm... I havn't seen this one, but it makes sense it could happen. Can you give me a sequence that consistently reproduces it? -Tom
