https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260523
--- Comment #13 from Ed Maste <[email protected]> --- > @Ed Is there any value/desire here to change our ar over time / long-term to > be consistent with other ar's, or is that effective a noop given the switch > to llvm-ar? Said another way, is the target state that 'our ar' is deprecated > and removed? Yes, my expectation is that we will switch to llvm-ar and that will introduce -T thin archive support consistent with GNU ar and others. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
