https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=261798
Kubilay Kocak <ko...@freebsd.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |needs-qa, regression
CC| |bro...@freebsd.org,
| |d...@freebsd.org,
| |toolchain@FreeBSD.org
Summary|lang/ghc: fix llvm code |lang/ghc: Fails to compile
|generation |due to base/ports LLVM
| |triple target names: error:
| |Warning: Couldn't figure
| |out LLVM version!
Status|New |Open
Flags| |maintainer-feedback?(brooks
| |@FreeBSD.org),
| |maintainer-feedback?(dim@Fr
| |eeBSD.org),
| |merge-quarterly?
--- Comment #1 from Kubilay Kocak <ko...@freebsd.org> ---
>From ghc patch:
+- "amd64-portbld-freebsd"
++ "x86_64-portbld-freebsd"
Is/was the triple name for base/ports LLVM's intended and expected and is this
issue just that GHC hadn't yet followed, or is this something that's better
addressed in those ports at a toolchain/arch level with respect to how LLVM is
built and presents itself?
^Triage: Loop in ports llvm (brooks) and base toolchain (dim)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
