https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=261977
--- Comment #10 from Mark Millard <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Piotr Kubaj from comment #7) While I had been referencing a port-specific option, I see there is a USE_LTO= available in the infrastructure. I've no clue of the intent. May be use of bootstrap-lto-noplugin vs. bootstrap-debug should repect the status of the USE_LTO? I leave it to someone that knows the intended direction for having optional LTO use as the ports progress --or if there is an intent to have it be optional at all long term. (Even if I consider lack of optionality for LTO being an odd choice when there are notable time or memory tradeoffs.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
