https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=281765
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Engberg <dii...@freebsd.org> --- The major issue that it changes how it's supposed to work from upstream documentation. If it's such an issue just enforce "fat"LTO which at least in my experience is noticably faster than ThinLTO using a single thread. What's the issue with backing it out and specifying a value when needed? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
