On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 02:01:23PM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > No, -m64 indicates "compile in 64-bit mode", not "Use exactly the original v9 > ISA with no later extensions."
Oh, come on. -xarch=v9 means "compile in LP64 mode using exactly the original v9 isa with no later extensions". -m64 -xarch=generic (which is equivalent to -m64, as -xarch=generic is default) does just that. Have a nice day, Fedor. > > -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com > Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering > > Fedor Sergeev wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 01:14:22PM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > >> Is there any replacement for -xarch=v9 to indicate "Don't use any SPARC ISA > >> extensions so this runs on all sun4u/sun4v machines" that doesn't result in > >> Sun Studio issuing obnoxious "We obsoleted your flags" warnings for every > >> file compiled? > > > > -m64 > > > > regards, > > Fedor. > > > >> -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com > >> Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering > >> > >> Darryl Gove wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> If you're building with Sun Studio 12, then the options we prefer going > >>> forward are: > >>> > >>> -xarch=generic > >>> -xarch=sparcvis > >>> -xarch=sparcvis2 > >>> -xarch=spacfmaf > >>> > >>> http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/documentation/ss12/whatsnew.html > >>> > >>> So v9c should not be used. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> > >>> Darryl. > >>> > >>> > >>> James Carlson wrote: > >>>> Roland Mainz writes: > >>>> > >>>>> usr/src/Makefile.master references the value "v9c" as option for the Sun > >>>>> Studio compiler... > >>>>> > >>>> A quick google search leads to discussion of SPARC64 VI CPUs, > >>>> including a reference on this page: > >>>> > >>>> http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/support/Ccompare.html > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> ... but the manpage cc(1) does not reference it. Is this a documentation > >>>>> bug in cc(1) or something else ? > >>>>> > >>>> The history here seems murky. CR 6520539 seems to describe the > >>>> option, but there's nothing I can see in the documentation, and the > >>>> related CRs for implementing it don't mention it at all. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> tools-compilers mailing list > >>> tools-compilers at opensolaris.org > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> tools-compilers mailing list > >> tools-compilers at opensolaris.org > > _______________________________________________ > > tools-compilers mailing list > > tools-compilers at opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ > tools-compilers mailing list > tools-compilers at opensolaris.org
