Well, the code I am working on right now is ksh93 and that is not really a CPU-hungry monster application... I would even be happy with something which needs 50times more time for execution...
That's good to know in terms of setting our priorities.
BTW: What about using "valgrind"'s solution to rewrite the code on demand (e.g. replace priviledged instructions etc.) ?
There is nothing wrong with that approach in general, it's just that our existing RTC technology uses a completely different approach. Both approaches have OS-interface issues that create major maintenance problems.
Uhm... I thought the "utrap" feature is something unique to the UltraSPARC hardware... or am I completely wrong here ?
Yes, I think the RFE is misnamed. It is really requesting something like the "fast trap" interface, using whatever CPU features that might be available. Someone updated the description, so you should be able to read more details in the bug, as soon as the bug update gets pushed out. _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list [email protected]
