On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 04:52:02PM -0700, Bill Shannon wrote: > >hg outgoing and hg incoming. > > Ah ha! Any chance we could get -n options to push and pull, since the > functionality is clearly there?
I don't understand why you'd want that, other than "it's what Teamware does". outgoing/incoming are perfectly fine as far as I can see. > I think of hg commit as equivalent to sccs delget. You need to significantly revise this thought :) In mq, hg qrefresh is the nearest equivalent... > I'm not so much trying to argue about which is "right" or "wrong". > I'm mostly pointing out that this is different, and to better support > our people and our processes it would be good if there were fewer > differences. Certainly. A number of these differences, IMO, need to belong in 'wx', though, since they can be quite specific to the way we choose to do things rather than generally useful... others might make sense in hg itself, or mq, or an extension, etc. regards john _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list tools-discuss@opensolaris.org
